A DAWN OF RESURRECTION BREAKS IN THE EAST
|
The only ones to stand firm under such a trial are those who, knowing themselves to be small and weak, pray and trust themselves to the might of their all-powerful Father, supported by the Church. The life of Brother Peter Zhou Bangjiu is a poignant illustration of this truth. But there is more: this confessor of the faith wished to act as the voice of those who, from the depths of communist prisons, were unable to make themselves heard, men for instance like the three bishops arrested during Cardinal Etchegaray’s recent trip to China and like the elderly priest who was martyred on the same date (cf. English CRC no 334, p. 13). These men do not complain of the persecution they have been forced to undergo at the hands of the Communists, but rather of the treason of their brothers in Rome who, currying favour with the Peking regime, are seeking to effect a reconciliation with the so-called “patriotic” schismatic Church, whatever the cost. His work is dedicated to Our Lady of China, Queen of Heaven and earth, Empress and “Holy Mother” of the Chinese people, whose image adorned our first number of Resurrection! «Queen of martyrs, The numerous martyrs of the most valiant Church
of China are the very same who were seen by the children of Fatima
«in an immense light that is God» on 13 July 1917: «Beneath the two
arms of the Cross, there were two Angels each with a crystal aspersorium
in his hand, in which they gathered up the blood of the Martyrs and with
it sprinkled the souls that were making their way to God.»
|
|
This book is one long hymn of gratitude intoned by the good brother in praise of those whom Divine Providence placed on his path to form him and encourage him through their example and prayer. His fidelity is the simple effect, he says smiling, of the merciful tenderness of Our Father in Heaven, who prepared him from his very first steps in the religious life to undergo a terrible spiritual combat and to conquer!
A year after they came into power, the Communists threw off the mask, and the vice tightened around the Catholic Church in China. Brother Peter had only just taken his first vows when, «on 13 December 1950, the Peking news agency “New China” published a document called the Manifesto of Guangyuan. In it, Father Matthias Wang Liangzuo, its author, reproduced sections of the official declaration which had been approved by the government and spread by the Protestants some time beforehand. The manifesto announced a determination to break every link with imperialism and to build a new independent Church, entirely responsible for its own reforms, its own finances, its own administration and apostolate. The declaration was intended to put a firm stop to Vatican intervention in the internal affairs of China and declared that imperialism should not be allowed to besmirch the sanctity of the Church.» On 31 March 1951, the Apostolic Internuncio to China, Mgr Antonio Riberi, issued a solemn warning against this so-called reform “of the the three autonomies”, exhorting Catholics not to yield to the temptation to schism. He was expelled shortly afterwards. The reform desired by the government and relayed by a frighteningly effective propaganda, was imposed by force throughout the country, sowing terror among the faithful: «Catholic schools were taken by storm, hospitals and orphanages were forcibly seized, and any properties that remained to the Church were confiscated. Many priests, both Chinese and foreign, many nuns and members of the laity were indicted for their loyalty and publicly condemned, imprisoned or expelled. Some of them were even executed.» Alas, a deep rift opened up at the very heart of the Chinese Church, between those who accepted the reform and fell in with the government’s demands, and those who refused to make any compromise out of fidelity to Rome and their missionaries. The Chinese Communist Party exploited this opposition between the “patriotic” and the “underground” Catholics in a diabolical way, describing the latter at that time as “counter-revolutionary” imperialists (cf. Resurrection no 1, p. 9-10). Amid the immense confusion reigning among both clergy and faithful, our Brother Peter was informed about the danger by his superior: «Father Raphael Vinciarelli gave talks to the community on the situation of the local Church and the monastery, asking us to prepare ourselves for any eventuality. We tried to maintain our life of daily prayer by observing the customary timetable of Mass, Vespers and Compline, and we continued to teach, study and dedicate ourselves to all kinds of work despite the tense atmosphere bordering on panic.» In October 1951, the police searches were stepped up at the monastery: «One morning, while Father Raphael was typing away in his office, a policeman burst in upon him and asked him in a loud voice: – What are you writing there? «Our prior, maintaining his calm, immediately removed the paper from the machine and handed it to him saying: – By all means, read it! This is what I have been writing. You surely know French, you can understand my typing. «The policeman looked over the paper in an arrogant manner, then put it down on the desk. After that he advanced and entered the Father Prior’s cell in order to have a good look around before quietly departing. «Later, that same month, our prior bade me come to his office and gave me the job of secretly translating two documents from French into Chinese. The first was a prayer written by Pope Pius XII, dedicated to Pope Blessed Pius X. The second document was a three page catechism written by Father Raphael, intended to encourage Catholics in times of persecution. This little Catechism presented Catholics with the basic teachings of the Church, particularly on the Pope’s supremacy over the whole Church. It insisted on constant prayer and the practical necessity of the commandments, an infallible means of keeping the faith. But it also explained that it was necessary to struggle in order to lead a pure and holy life and remain a true witness for Christ. It gave practical instructions, explaining how to remain reconciled with God and what concrete actions to take in situations of marriage or death in the absence of the holy sacraments.» From the very first stirrings of the persecution, several Catholics had apostatised. «Each of these events, each of these disasters had the effect of piercing my heart like the sword which pierced the Immaculate Heart of the Virgin Mary at the foot of the Cross. Affliction and indignation increased my desire to make reparation on behalf of the Lord. I drew close to Jesus, afflicted by the spectacle of the desertion of some of His disciples, repeating with my holy patron the Apostle Saint Peter: “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of Eternal Life. We believe, we know that you are the only Son of God.” (Jn 6.68-69) I had a desire to fight for my Lord and to remove every offence committed against His Church; I longed with all my strength to see the day come when a great and holy battle should be fought for the Catholic faith. «My daily prayers and my readings of the Scriptures consoled me and put me on guard. The words seemed to rise out of the sacred text like so many exhortations and warnings: “If anyone declares himself for me in the presence of men, I will declare myself for him in the presence of my Father in Heaven; but the one who disowns me in the presence of men, I will disown in the presence of my Father in Heaven” (Mt 10.32-33) […]. These profound words of encouragement spoken by Jesus went straight to my heart, and His sacred appeal resounded in my ears. Every word resonated like the orders of supreme command or like the instructions of a King giving strength and courage for the combat, or again like the sound of the trumpet at the hour of attack.» Partial translation of a 10-page article by Brother Louis-Joseph. Readers can obtain Brother Peter Zhou Bangjiu’s 176-page book in English from Serenity, 8016 Marion Drive, Maria Stein, OH 45860, USA. See also: www.serenitymusic.com/books.html. |
|
from Jerusalem to Rome What occupies all our thoughts here is the Church, the honour of the Church, the exaltation of the Church. When our Father was considering a title for the works of Brother Michael and of Brother Francis summarising “forty years of Catholic Counter-Reform”, he chose FOR THE CHURCH. Today, what fills our Father’s heart is that same divine jealousy which inspired Saint Paul in his struggle against his unfaithful Corinthians. «I only wish you were able to support a little foolishness from me. But of course: you are tolerant towards me. You see, the jealousy that I feel for you is God’s own jealousy: I arranged for you to marry Christ so that I might give you away as a chaste virgin to this one husband. But the serpent with his cunning, seduced Eve, and I am afraid that in the same way your ideas may get corrupted and turned away from simple devotion to Christ. Because any newcomer has only to proclaim a new Jesus, different from the one that we preached, or you have only to receive a new Spirit, different from the one you have already received, or a new Gospel, different from the one you have already accepted – and you welcome it with open arms. As far as I can tell, these arch-apostles have nothing more than I have. I may not be a polished speechmaker, but as for knowledge, that is a different matter; surely we have made this plain, speaking on every subject in front of all of you»… in forty volumes and four thousand hours of conferences (see our Catalogue)! And Saint Paul was already denouncing those who preached a new evangelisation, censuring them in a vigorous manner: «These people are counterfeit apostles, they are dishonest workmen disguised as apostles of Christ. There is nothing unexpected about that; if Satan himself goes about disguised as an angel of light, there is no need to be surprised when his servants too disguise themselves as the servants of righteousness. They will come to the end that they deserve.» (2 Co 11.1-6, 13-15) We are not Saint Paul. «But if we were saints», sighs our Father, «we would be infinitely more vigorous in defending the honour of Christ and His martyrs. A Father de Montfort would go on foot to Rome and throw himself on the knees of the Pope: “Most Holy Father, return and confirm your brothers”… – No, Father! A Father de Montfort would find the Bronze Door barred by the Italian police, that is, if he had not already been committed to a mental asylum.»
This June began with the meeting of the cardinals in Rome and the apotheosis of John XXIII. When he read the newspaper reports of this sterile seminar of cardinals and saw the triumphal procession of John XXIII in Saint Peter’s, our Father remained speechless, as one is before a sudden unexpected disaster or before the words and gestures of one who has lost his mind and makes absurd, uncontrollable decisions. Distress, stupefaction, indignation and ultimately silence as though before some great disaster. It was the canonisation of the Council that John Paul II was pursuing through this apotheosis. But Brother Bruno sees in this rather the literal fulfilment of the Third Secret of Fatima: the corpse of John XXIII held in honour by the corpses of the city half in ruins. Of his life the journalists have nothing to say except that he opened the windows of the Church to modernity and let fresh air into the house. It is hardly enough to make a saint. Several months earlier, with no other splendour than that of the homage of a people who were not deceived, our beloved Pius IX had himself been exposed in a glass reliquary and led in a procession full of fervour and devotion to Senigallia, the land of his birth, and to Loreto, where the Blessed Virgin had spoken to his childlike heart. «Every year, we read in The Message of the Santa Casa, when his parents made the decision to go up to Loreto from Senigallia, he was unable to sleep for thinking about this. Between the walls of the Holy House, the young Mastai Ferretti made the Madonna a vow to embrace the priesthood. And when he was elected Pope on 16 June 1846, he took his pectoral cross and his ring and sent them to the sanctuary of Loreto. On 14 August 1855, he had a copy of the bull of the proclamation of the dogma of the Immaculate Conception taken there, signed in his own hand.» And quite naturally the author of this article directs his reader’s thoughts towards the Blessed Virgin who was, for him also, the Star of his pontificate. As for genuine modernity, here is an example: in his apostolic letter of 26 August 1852 which he devoted to the sanctuary of Loreto, Pius IX gave a scientific and historical explanation of the translation of the Santa Casa: «Among all the churches raised in honour of the Most Blessed and Immaculate Virgin, Mother of God, the Holy House of Loreto shines out in a marvellous manner… «It is honoured and venerated, this House of Nazareth so dear to God’s Heart, and which, constructed in Galilee, was later uprooted from its foundations and, in accordance with His Good Pleasure, transported by land and sea over a great distance, first to Dalmatia and then to Italy. No one should be surprised, therefore, if from the beginnings of Christianity, men gave the Holy House the form of a church, surrounding it with the greatest veneration and visiting it uninterruptedly over the centuries with sentiments of faith.» Under the wise leadership of Blessed Pius IX, true science went hand in hand with the true faith (cf. English CRC no 280, November 1995).
After that came the Pentecost conference of the Phalange: “Phalangist morals in 150 Points”. Gaudium de veritate! There was general enthusiasm for the plenum of the truth, but also for the speaker, our Father on a large screen, acting and imitating with extraordinary alacrity all the people whose life and thought illustrated his demonstrations. What a spectacle! You should see our Father imitating the baker woman of Glux or of Chônas gently bemoaning the fact that at the end of every month her customers would ask for credit: «We are not going to refuse them, monsieur le Curé, they are old customers, and then again they are not well off… But they do not realise…» Extraordinary humanity of this village life, a life based on the family. “Family”… this is the word which is going to govern the whole edifice of society, in “ecological prudence”, a true savoir-vivre, under the eye of God. This new and most ancient society, so full of graces, the family of families, can be recognised in the person of its King, the chief figure of the father of the family. The bond of its unity is: the Catholic faith, the parish its spiritual family, its parish priest, the living presence of the bishop, and «over and above everything else, the papacy». It is a Catholic society in which money does not predominate, only charity. Nevertheless, I am not sure whether our young people will have fully understood the revolutionary character of these 150 Points which tear the mask off secularism, totalitarian democracy, and the enormous tedium and dreariness of State socialism. The world into which our Father introduced us is, on the other hand, a world that is extraordinarily human, full of joy and fraternal, ultimately free. Governed by the noble Catholic faith, in the tranquillity of the protective order, the Nation and the Church are ready for the peaceful conquests of charity, missionary, colonial and invigorating. But above all, the 150 Points represent the application and demonstration of the fruitfulness of the relational philosophy. Here the person is defined by the place his divine vocation allots him in his family line, in the Church and in the Nation, his vocation as a member of a Body. His whole dignity lies in fidelity to his fathers, to his teachers and brothers, and through them to Christ, to whom he vows himself, devotes himself, gives himself, consecrates himself, already receiving from Him the image of eternity. It is the perfect antidote to revolutionary individualism, to comfortable democratic egoism, falsely popular but in reality inhuman. I can only find one expression to define this life: it is the civilisation of love. This love is translated among us today by a perfect unity, belonging as it were to a single spirit, resistant to every assault.
There are certain words that speak to a predestined soul. Our Father gave the example of that child who, while certainly not of good birth, felt himself attracted, captivated by the mere mention of the word Catholic, a word which his own family would never pronounce except with hatred. The three whitenesses speak in the same way to every truly Catholic heart: the Eucharist, the Immaculate, the Pope. It is an infinite source of happiness for us to be accused and dragged before popular tribunals on account of these three beloved whitenesses, the three precious pearls of our Catholicism… It is in this way that we find ourselves following the footsteps of Saint Paul as he made his way from Jerusalem to Rome, calling upon Roman justice to defend him against the pack of dogs intent on his destruction. «Some days later, King Agrippa and Bernice arrived in Caesarea and paid their respects to Festus. Their visit lasted several days, and Festus put Paul’s case before the king. “There is a man here”, he said, “whom Felix left behind in custody, and while I was in Jerusalem the chief priests and elders of the Jews laid information against him, demanding his condemnation. But I told them that Romans are not in the habit of surrendering any man until the accused confronts his accusers and is given an opportunity to defend himself against the charge”… «So the next day Agrippa and Bernice arrived in great state and entered the audience chamber attended by the tribunes and the city notables; and Festus ordered Paul to be brought in. Then Festus said, “King Agrippa, and all here present with us, you see before you the man about whom the whole Jewish community has petitioned me, both in Jerusalem and here, loudly protesting that he ought not to be allowed to remain alive. For my part I am satisfied that he has committed no capital crime, but when he himself appealed to the august emperor I decided to send him. But I have nothing definite that I can write to his Imperial Majesty about him; that is why I have produced him before you all, and before you in particular, King Agrippa, so that after the examination I may have something to write. It seems to me pointless to send a prisoner without indicating the charges against him”… «I consider myself fortunate, King Agrippa, said Saint Paul, in that it is before you I am to answer today all the charges made against me by the Jews… It is for my hope in the promise made by God to our ancestors that I am on trial… saying nothing more than what the prophets and Moses himself said would happen: that the Christ was to suffer and that, as the first to rise from the dead, he was to proclaim that light now shone for our people and for the pagans too…» (Ac 25-26) And for the third time, he recounted the miracle that had led to his faith and conversion on the road to Damascus. This same dazzling light threw seventy thousand people to their knees on 13 October 1917 at Fatima, and it was for the whole Church that it shone, confirming Heaven’s will to establish in the world devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. And of this we are the witnesses!
Today our Father is reaping from our phalangist friends what he has been sowing for forty years. This is the secret of their fidelity. Over the years, they have learned of our devotion to the Immaculate. This is the same as that of Saint Bernard and Duns Scotus, of Saint John Eudes and Father de Montfort – of whom the Sisters of the Providence in Dinan used to say that it took the place for him of a dominant passion; it is the same as that of Blessed Pius IX, Saint Pius X and Saint Maximilian-Mary Kolbe. «The Immaculate is the doorway between God and the creature», the latter would say. «She is the faithful reflection of divine perfection and holiness… We may affirm that the Immaculate is in a certain sense the incarnation of the Holy Spirit… that everything in the universe is accomplished in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit through the Immaculate.» Our devotion is that of Saint Catherine Labouré, Saint Bernadette and the holy children of Fatima. Finally, it is that of John Paul I who promised to be a son obedient to every wish of Her Immaculate Heart. As for our Father’s Eucharistic realism, it has never attained the level of that of Saint John Chrysostom: «Consider the honour to which you have been raised, the table at which you sit. What the Angels behold trembling, what they dare not contemplate directly on account of the splendour radiating from it, this we make our food, this we unite ourselves to, and so we become one body and one flesh with Christ.» As for Saint Ambrose, he simply applies to the Eucharistic Communion these words from Genesis: «The two will become one flesh.» Everything is pure for those who are pure, everything is a scandal for the Pharisees. «Nothing in the world is immune from contradiction by sad and petty minds. And in anything, no matter how good it may be, one can always find something to object to if one wants to chip away at it.» That was the experience of Saint Francis de Sales. Our Eucharistic faith is that of Father de Foucauld and Saint Peter Julian Eymard, whose lives our children can meditate on in this year’s beautifully written booklets for Lent and the month of the Sacred Heart. Fidelity to the Pope? Here is the cross of our Father’s whole life – apart from the divine surprise of the thirty-three years of John Paul I’s pontificate –, as it was for his parents at the time of the NON POSSUMUS. But our unswerving appeal to Roman justice is sufficient to prove our genuine Catholicism. As the Abbé Berto once said, «Monsieur l’abbé, you are Roman». And here is what one of our friends says: «I must tell you that three years ago I had put all my hope and my phalangist enthusiasm in this ultimate recourse to the Apostolic Signatura which, following your lead, I saw as the last bastion of Law, the preserver of Justice in the Church, capable of resisting the errors of the Holy See and of recognising the abuse of power. «Then, as time passed and there was no news, I began to think that this Appeal would remain unanswered due to the embarrassing situation in which the strength of your case had placed them: at least we were protected by the suspensive effect. I now see that the Tribunal is made up of functionaries just like the others. «Shall we therefore despair of the Church? God forbid. You have taught us all too well to love that divine je ne sais quoi which our Mother still possesses, even though she is sick. We may be standing outside in the porch, but we will continue to beckon the passers-by to come in. «No, this news at first filled me with compassion for you, – poor Father! once again he finds himself in an apparently inextricable situation, a decision very heavy to bear! – and then I invoked the Holy Spirit asking Him once again to inspire you with a response that was salvific and supernatural, avoiding both schism and apostasy. «But I also asked Him to inspire you with a total trust. Without doubt the Good God wishes to extract from you the most heroic submission to His will, now that you have lost the support of the Law. For this reason, looking beyond the legal setback, I wish to follow you in that spirit of yours which is above all mystical and which makes you think of Heaven first rather than of earth. «Your sermon at the Mutualité referring us to Saint John’s Apocalypse was exemplary. I found it particularly touching, for my first conversion goes back to your retreat in 1974, partly followed in community. It was your commentary on the exhortation to Laodicea, “You are neither hot nor cold, but lukewarm!” which immediately cured me of my liberalism, my reservations and my hesitation in committing myself to follow you. That day I decided to become your disciple, so that I would not remain lukewarm, and I have never regretted this. «This year, at the Mutualité, it was the exhortation to perseverance which stirred me: “Remain faithful unto death!” «This imminent new repudiation from Rome led me to review the reasons that decided me to follow you, to have the courage to follow your example and to resist the injunctions of Peter’s successor. «Two maxims sum up its legitimacy: “The Pope may not be judged by anyone, except he be called to task for having deviated from the faith.” (Gratian) «The other is from you: “The suspicion of heresy justifies our withdrawal of obedience.” «It is clear, it is sufficient to resolve the issue of conscience. «There remains the central question of the cult of man and religious liberty – closely connected – which Authority refuses to settle. «Then there is this series of unprecedented gestures: Assisi, Jerusalem, Damascus. They are like so many blots disfiguring the dear face of our Mother and revealing on the surface the disease which is eating her away from the inside. «I was particularly struck by one recent detail: the list of topics covered in the extraordinary consistory, eleven topics relating to sociology, culture and communication, and not a single topic about the Catholic faith! «What a contrast with the teaching and ardent impulses of our dear Albino Luciani! «But I have run out of time, and I have not told you the half of what I wanted to say to you: my enthusiasm for all these editions of Resurrection, for the fervent commentaries on the Gospel by Brother Bruno and our Blessed Father de Foucauld, for the heroic virtues of the models recounted by Brother Thomas: General de Sonis and John Paul I, and always of course for your latest thinking on Fatima. «I cannot restrain the flood of my affection and total filial trust in you, my admiration for everything you have given us to love, and above all, my boundless gratitude for the “highroad” you have followed for forty years which has kept us safe under the protective mantle of the Immaculate…» Saint John replies to this excellent friend as he did to the church of Laodicea: «Those who prove victorious I will allow to share my throne, just as I took my own place on the throne of my Father…» Brother Gerard of the Virgin |
|
THE MARIAN DEVOTION OF THE ABBÉ DES GENETTES WHEN he extolled the glories of Mary Immaculate, the parish priest of Our Lady of Victories would become impassioned and in his sacred rapture he would stir every heart. The Abbé des Genettes made abundant use of Sacred Scripture, both Old and New Testaments, from Genesis to the Apocalypse, whose twelfth chapter filled him with fervour: «A great sign appeared in Heaven. Only Mary traces Her ancestry all the way back to God. MARY WAS OF GOD, “fuit Dei”. What do all your genealogies present to me? Men. They always end in men. MARY’S GENEALOGY, WHICH ENDED IN A GOD, COMMENCED IN A GOD.» He quoted the Song of Songs to exalt «Mary’s beauty which is a completely heavenly beauty, an emanation of that divine Beauty which renders for ever happy him who is able to behold it face to Face.» In a homily on the Assumption of the Virgin Mary, he took as his theme a very telling figurative, quoting the beginning of chapter 7 of the second Book of Samuel: «The King, being at peace in his palace and having nothing to fear from any of his enemies, turned his thoughts to the holy Ark and had it set in a place more worthy of it in the centre of the tabernacle.» And the Abbé des Genettes comments: «Thus what David did for the material Ark, Jesus does for Mary: having conquered all His enemies and taken His seat at the right hand of His Father, He casts a look of delight upon His Holy Mother. He does not want Her to remain any longer on the earth. Ever since the Ascension of Her Divine Son had deprived Her of the presence of Her Beloved, Her pure soul has flown to Heaven. Yes, today is the triumph of Divine Charity in the Hearts of Jesus and Mary; it is in this double mystery of Her death and glorious Assumption that this mutual exchange of love shines forth. IT WAS THUS THAT THIS HOLY LOVER FELL ASLEEP IN THE EMBRACE OF THE LORD. All we can say is that Mary went up to Heaven in a manner befitting the Mother of God and that, in Her Assumption, She followed the luminous path traced out for Her by Jesus Christ in His triumphant Ascension. «For, I ask you, could Jesus Christ do anything more glorious for His Mother than to make Her, in all things and as far as He could, like unto Himself and to give Her triumph the most splendid characteristics of His own? Who can understand the ineffable sweetness of such a long-desired reunion? Here was a Mother, indeed the most tender of all mothers, beholding Her Son again, a unique Son uniquely loved… She was seeing Her adorable Son again and beholding Him for ever. Here lie secrets which no eye has ever seen. Let us prepare ourselves for this great spectacle which will undoubtedly form a large part of our felicity. «It is there, continues the Abbé des Genettes, that She shows Her Divine Son the womb where He lay, while the Son shows His Father the wounds He received out of love for us and which He has retained. Both of them are triumphant, the Son by virtue of His sovereignty, the Mother by the charm of Her humble supplication…» In another sermon, the Abbé des Genettes presents the Immaculate Virgin as She who will crush the Serpent’s head. «Arising in our midst, predestined before all time, this august young woman appears to have been the exclusive object of the divine favours. One might say that the Most High seems to have exercised His Omnipotence to fill Mary with His graces and His favours. Promised to the human race from the very first days of the world, She is presented by God Himself as the restorer of man’s salvation. And to give us a sense of Her power, Scripture presents us with the charming figures of “the tender Rebecca, the virtuous and prudent Abigail, the strong Deborah, the glorious Bathsheba”… Charming and generous women, but nevertheless far beneath the “Divine Mary” who had the glorious and singular privilege of being announced to the world by the Eternal God Himself from the very first days of Creation, of being presented as the channel of the divine mercies; Mary was, from the very origins of the world, the object of the Most High’s good pleasure. It was with tenderness that the God of all goodness announced to the first sinners that She was coming to snatch them away from their slavery to the devil over the coming centuries. «SHE EXISTED, THEREFORE, FROM THE VERY BEGINNING OF THE WORLD, AND I MIGHT SAY FROM ALL ETERNITY, FORTIFIED WITH DIVINE GRACES AND FAVOURS.» (L’ABBÉ DES GENETTES, APÔTRE ET SERVITEUR DE MARIE, by Sister Mary-Angelica of the Cross, p. 252-254) |
|
I BELIEVE IN THE HOLY CHURCH Letter to my Friends no 134, 19 March 1963 THE mere thought of belonging to the Church is enough to renew the jubilation of our souls, for the Church is Holy like her Spouse Jesus Christ from whom she has received such a likeness that there is nothing in this world so beautiful, so wise, so majestic as her face and her whole being. She is our Mother, and I add: she is the unique, incomparable Spouse; she alone is holy, wise, sublime, leaving false religions and philosophies far behind in their delusive darkness. In her is found, united and prosperous, all that is best in the world. The various goods which make up civilisation and culture, prosperity and science, technology and the very arts themselves all come to us from her who created them or at least saved them from the ephemeral societies in which they had first appeared. Wherever I turn, I find nothing but assurance and hope in her. Her two thousand years of glory, her marvellous expansion to the ends of the earth respond to my doubts and calm my uneasiness. There is in her a divine force, but this is to say too little… In this Spouse there lives the Spirit of her Spouse, Jesus, «this man commended to us by God by the miracles and portents and signs that he worked among us» (Ac 2.22), a man the like of whom has never appeared and will never appear on earth again, tender, wise and strong. In everything she does the Church radiates the life, health and splendour of Jesus Christ, and her children never cease returning to her arms, to drink from her swollen breasts the milk of her doctrine and her charity. The Church! As soon as we mention her, as soon as we come together to sing God’s praises, we experience the joy of a pure fraternity. Race, colour, status, talents, riches, all these distinctions cease to matter to the extent that we express our faith in her, our worship and our submission to her. Her motherhood allows us to commune with her in the depths of our being and, forming but one heart and one soul, to feel ourselves incorporated in this one selfsame Body of which Jesus is the Head and the Holy Spirit the Life. Thus we all vibrate in unison, with an ineffable harmony, under the gentle touch of this divine August Person. Such is Charity, a love that is spiritual and perfect. The Church is in every fibre of our heart, for she is what we love most on earth; she is in our memory, on account of the treasure of her dogmas, her liturgies, her hymns, her holy images and her marvellous buildings; in our will, for it is her commandments and her whole age-old discipline, her revered ordinances, that guide us infallibly on the way to Heaven; and finally she is in our intelligence, for the wisdom of her Words inebriates us night and day with their «aromatic wine», making germinate in our being the purity of virgins and the fecundity of mothers, through means of an inner grace which welcomes and vivifies whatever this august Mother gives us from outside. As long as this holy emotion seizes my whole being like an absolute conviction, a sovereign attachment, a love that passes all understanding, a desire to die if perchance I may one day be a martyr of love for this wonderful Mother, who will deny me this character as a child of the Catholic, Apostolic and Roman Church? It belongs to me and no one can snatch it away from me! Is there a sacrament, a liturgy, a single one of her maternal gestures that finds me rebellious or merely restive? I weep rather with wonder and rapture at the least of her caresses. Even if she strikes me, she will find me joyful, for she corrects and reproves me for my own good. Is there a single one of her dogmas that is not imprinted on my mind in an irreformable manner, with God’s good grace? Each time I delve into the immense library of my Mother and open a book by one of her doctors and saints, I am captivated and dazzled by these cascades of splendour. My soul is that of a disciple who drinks avidly and without weariness the vitalizing waters of her Scriptures. Thus my will consents to every one of her desires; her laws and her virtues are ever before me like learned and demanding teachers whom I love and respect. Ah! that is not to say that I have always followed their advice or even their commands! All too often – I must humbly confess, my heart overwhelmed with sorrow – all too often I have wounded and spurned by my execrable conduct these servants and these teachers whom my Mother sends me. And I deeply regret this. Never, however, have I ever disputed, even in my very worst moments of sin, the appropriateness, the validity and the wisdom of what they teach and prescribe to me in her Name. It is only the violent love I bear for my Mother that leads me to tear, to snatch from her face and her body magnificently adorned by God Himself, these loathsome rags, these soiled and sacrilegious cloths in which the World and our Times seek to clothe her. Ah! how gladly I suffer and excuse the faults and failings of my brothers as I daily beg God and my brothers themselves to forgive me my own faults which are undoubtedly far worse. But despite the blemishes of her small children, the perfect purity of their mother is in no way affected. It is not for this reason that the Church is suffering. Though her hands never cease to wash sinners, yet they remain spotlessly clean, with a gentle luminosity. The million and one miserable faults of her numerous sons dispersed throughout time have in no way altered the immense splendour of this Holy Temple of God, while their millions of prayers, good works and penances enhance it in my eyes with new colour and a brilliant sheen. Admirable she has been, is, and always will be, in her poor human members, because the only thing of theirs that she preserves and renders immortal is that element of truth and goodness which God has raised up and strengthened in them. But what is not good, what is not right, is that her sons have turned away in disgust from their Mother and even speak of exchanging her for another. How could anyone follow them down such a path? To invent novelties which contradict what is ancient and unchangeable, to forge the particular in opposition to the universal, these are acts of impiety. «Quod ubique, quod semper, quod ab omnibus teneamus» is the ancient principle of Saint Vincent de Lérins which resounds in our hearts, having given light to the Church for fifteen centuries. We hold on to it like a lifeline, just as so many others have throughout the vicissitudes of History, looking to it for their security! «Let us hold on to that which has been believed everywhere, always and by all people!» Anyone who rejects this sacred maxim is a heretic, an innovator or an apostate! But he who holds on to it is a Son of the Church. Furthermore, let those who find this «integrism» laughable, outdated, sterile and wearisome know that they have made shipwreck of the faith, for to scorn the Church is to insult Jesus Christ. On the contrary, such fidelity is impregnable, and no one, not even an Angel, can chase out of the Church him who cleaves to her with love. Over the centuries there have arisen strange teachers and prophets of Lies. Perhaps never so much as in our times have they spread with such noise and grand gestures doctrines, liturgies and new methods that are inspired or imposed by the present Century and the World from which they derive. They describe themselves as the Church, and should anyone fail to believe them, he will see himself declared a schismatic. Sometimes for a certain period and in a certain nation they may hold complete sway. It is then that their propaganda drowns out the murmur arising from the calm waters of the Siloam, the prayers and groans of the saints, and they will stop at nothing. They seek to choose a new spouse for the Lord, a good-looking provocative girl whom they prefer a hundred times to the incomparable Mother whose face reflects the heavenly beauty and ineffable wisdom of her Spouse. They have lost all their affection for her. If Jesus wishes to justify Himself before the present generation, He must repudiate His «feudal» and «obscure» Spouse of two millennia, but she whom they have prepared for Him as His new spouse is but a streetwalker, a woman already well known to and maintained by the arrogant men of this satanic World. I now come to the final part of my appeal. I will plead for my Mother. There are among us far too many small children who cry out and stamp their feet because their Mother has been taken away from them by people who want to throw them into the arms of a prostitute. They are supposed to smile and say «Mummy!» to this stepmother who has no love for them, but instead they weep and ask for her who gave life to their souls, who fed them, watched over them, looked after, educated and cherished them. So many people who enter the nuptial chamber with nothing but disdain for the legitimate Spouse, the holy and immaculate Mother, are guilty of mocking Jesus Christ. If He had thought to change His spouse over the course of history, He would have warned us first! But judging from the behaviour and remarks of this «new Church» it is only too evident that nothing is to be gained from such a monstrous exchange. It is constantly insulting and disparaging the Virginal and Maternal Church because down the ages, girded with chastity, her only desire, her only pleasure has been for her unique Spouse! This new church seeks to have the children of its prostitutions adopted by the Sons of God, children obtained from the idols it has chased after… Along with its hangers-on, it knows nothing of the profound, sure and secret love which Christ and the Church, Husband and Wife, have for each other, nor does it know how happy their children are in their company, children who dream of no greater happiness and who are filled with dread at the merest prospect of seeing the Stranger, the Abductor appear on the scene! Georges de NANTES.
|